On this page
RNX code library · 13 controls
RNX-220Citation Velocity & Node Pedigree
Read what these checks mean, why they matter and which evidence they concern. Each ID below keeps its canonical place in the RNX hierarchy.
These are free learning summaries, not full technical tests or an industry certification. Specialized checks apply only to the relevant feature. Experimental labels are preserved from the canonical source.
RNX-221 · Latent Space Presence Audit
RNX-221.T001
Accessible corpus presence evidence
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Report presence in a source only when it was observed.
Why it matters. A page's presence in a public collection does not prove inclusion in AI training.
Illustration — fictional. A public archive mention is represented as proof the brand was included in a proprietary model's training data.
When it applies. Inspected target: accessible corpus presence observation. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-222 · High-Weight Node Analysis
RNX-222.T001
Captured community mention
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Keep the actual evidence for a community mention.
Why it matters. A discussion's existence does not reveal the weight an AI system gives it.
Illustration — fictional. A forum mention of an unrelated same-name product is credited to this business.
When it applies. Inspected target: community mention capture. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-223 · Semantic Co-Occurrence Optimization
RNX-223.T001
Topical co-occurrence report
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Describe observed topic associations within the sample.
Why it matters. Nearby words do not establish cause or justify manufactured mention campaigns.
Illustration — fictional. Observed co-occurrence is turned into a requirement to buy keyword-rich editorial mentions.
When it applies. Inspected target: topical co-occurrence analysis. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-224 · Authority Node Pedigree Classification
RNX-224.T001
Paid-link qualification
core readiness
Identify paid links as paid placements.
Why it matters. A purchased mention is not an independent earned endorsement.
Illustration — fictional. A bought link is presented as an independent editorial endorsement.
When it applies. Inspected target: paid link. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-224.T002
Scaled-content value review
core readiness
Review large batches of content for real user value.
Why it matters. Many pages created mainly to manipulate rankings are not a useful information resource.
Illustration — fictional. City swaps invent service locations.
When it applies. Inspected target: scaled page. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-224.T003
False credential rejection
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Require real support for published credentials.
Why it matters. A badge or claim should not invent expertise or approval.
Illustration — fictional. Award belongs to another company.
When it applies. Inspected target: credential claim. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-224.T004
Editorial source-quality assessment
core readiness
Judge source quality using observable evidence and mark what is unknown.
Why it matters. A tool's authority score alone is not a complete editorial judgment.
Illustration — fictional. A copied anonymous page is given maximum source quality solely because a third-party metric is high.
When it applies. Inspected target: editorial source-quality assessment. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-225 · Citation Cluster Diversity
RNX-225.T001
Independent citation distribution
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Describe how citations are spread across inspected independent sources.
Why it matters. A small sample should not be presented as the whole web.
Illustration — fictional. Ten syndicated copies of one press release are counted as ten independent geographic sources.
When it applies. Inspected target: citation distribution cohort. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-225.T101
Earned citation opportunity qualification
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Seek earned references where your information helps a relevant audience.
Why it matters. Useful evidence is a stronger basis for outreach than buying unrelated links.
Illustration — fictional. The plan buys unrelated footer links because a tool labels the sites high authority.
When it applies. Inspected target: earned citation opportunity record. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-225.T102
Observed link relationship record
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Record the link that actually exists and how its relationship is labeled.
Why it matters. A plain brand mention is not a backlink.
Illustration — fictional. A plain-text brand mention is counted as a backlink.
When it applies. Inspected target: captured external link. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-225.T103
Lost citation confirmation
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Confirm a citation is really lost before acting.
Why it matters. A temporary timeout or moved source does not necessarily mean a publisher removed it.
Illustration — fictional. A crawler timeout is labeled link removal and a complaint is sent.
When it applies. Inspected target: suspected lost citation case. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-225.T104
Competitor citation-gap relevance
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Review competitor citations for relevance and editorial fit.
Why it matters. A competitor's paid coupon link is not automatically an authority opportunity for you.
Illustration — fictional. A competitor affiliate coupon link is treated as an editorial authority gap.
When it applies. Inspected target: competitor citation-gap row. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.
RNX-226 · Citation Independence Verification
RNX-226.T001
Citation independence check
Experimental — not an established ranking requirement
Disclose shared ownership or copied publication behind citations.
Why it matters. Ten copies of one story are not ten independent confirmations.
Illustration — fictional. Several publications owned by the same company are claimed to corroborate a fact independently without investigation.
When it applies. Inspected target: citation independence adjudication. Use this check only when that object or feature exists in the review scope; provider-specific checks require that provider's integration. Missing evidence remains unknown.